| Outreach Evaluation | |
|---|---|
|
Type of support given: |
Outreach SEMH support in school |
|
Name of staff delivering support: |
Hidden for Privacy Purposes |
|
Date: |
17.11.17 |
|
Please tick the appropriate box |
Strongly Agree |
Agree |
Disagree |
|
|
1. |
Was receipt of referral acknowledged within 48 hrs? |
x |
|
|
|
2. |
Did the Outreach Team demonstrate a range of skills and knowledge relating to behaviour? |
x |
|
|
|
3 |
Was the Outreach team well prepared for the visit? |
x |
|
|
|
4. |
Was advice given clearly defined? |
x |
|
|
|
5. |
Were strategies discussed during visits useful? |
x |
|
|
|
6. |
Were strategies discussed during visits relevant? |
x |
|
|
|
7. |
Were strategies discussed during visits realistic? |
x |
|
|
|
8. |
Was a positive interaction established with pupils? |
x |
|
|
|
9. |
Was a positive interaction established with school staff? |
x |
|
|
|
10. |
Were agreed objectives met? |
x |
|
|
|
Additional Comments:
Theresa provided valuable information which supported school and allowed a successful referral for a child to a SEMH nurture provision.
|
||||
Additional Questions
|
What did you find was the most valuable part of the service? |
Feedback and expertise. |
|||
|
Do you have any suggestions on how the service could be improved? |
With the recent introduction of the drop in sessions which are also fantastic, no further suggestions. |
|||
|
Other comments |
A valuable and professional service which improves outcomes for children and CPD for staff. |
|||
|
May we use your quotes/Comments? |
Yes |
x |
No |
|
